Most SEO specialists were not happy with the arrival of Google Instant. Another innovation, another long way to master the technique. It did wreck havoc on their nerves, but has anyone thought about Google Instant and link building? When you look at the Google search results as of September, you will find no articles or info regarding Google Instant and link building.
Considering the merit based link building, which remains the most effective way to assure a site of long term ranking success, at least people should talk about it.
There are so many articles written on Google Instant and how it is affecting or not affecting something but not a single article has been written on its impact on link building. Now the question is, does it really affect link building or haven’t they fully understood about it?
The final result of Google search will remain the same as before Instant came and the existing links and total link signature as well as single produced - nothing changes. All you see are those URLs showing for a split second as you go on typing letter by letter.
The only changes that we see is a bunch of URLs passing through on the way to the end results, but the result will always be the same.
Considering the merit based link building, which remains the most effective way to assure a site of long term ranking success, at least people should talk about it.
There are so many articles written on Google Instant and how it is affecting or not affecting something but not a single article has been written on its impact on link building. Now the question is, does it really affect link building or haven’t they fully understood about it?
The final result of Google search will remain the same as before Instant came and the existing links and total link signature as well as single produced - nothing changes. All you see are those URLs showing for a split second as you go on typing letter by letter.
The only changes that we see is a bunch of URLs passing through on the way to the end results, but the result will always be the same.
Comments